🗺 Every page — the whole flow
The votes
Open questionsElections — when, where, howVoter turnoutPriorities boardWhat came of itGet involved
The budget
▶ Take the 2-minute tourThe money trailYour tax bill, explainedGrants — money we could go getWho gets paidWhat the auditors reportedThe receipt — arithmetic checkedThe documentsHow every number is sourcedQuestions people ask — answered from the dataThe plain-words tour
Public needs
Our waterJails & prisons — from holding to buildingWho’s watching — cameras, plate readers, the rulesWho to call — county and state officesFind help
Dead ends & open questions
The docketThe calendarHow complete is this county?
Research for a better county
Receipts by railsFood sovereigntyGrow-opsThe food flywheelThe two potsFeeding the countyThe growing frontierThe grower’s almanacThe $400K blueprintThe research shelfThe precedents
The wider network
All countiesKindred workWhere we sit in the field
How to trust this
Where we standWhat we will never doHow this is securedThe traffic logOur storyReport a problem
Izard County, Arkansas · water

Our water

Clean water is the one public service every person uses every day. This page shows the options for keeping it safe and affordable as we grow — each graded honestly: proven, piloted, or still in the lab. Updated 2026-09-26.

Izard County’s water — not researched yet

We haven’t pulled Izard County’s water records yet. That means not yet gathered — not hidden. Every public water system must publish a yearly water-quality report, and violations are public. You can look yours up now:

Found your system’s report? Send it to us and we’ll add it here.

The options — graded A (proven), B (piloted), C (lab stage)

Drinking water

Find the water you’re losing A · Proven

Smart meters plus listening devices on the pipes find leaks early. Every gallon lost was already pumped and treated. Hot Springs, Arkansas cut water it couldn’t account for from 44% to 24%, and found one broken valve wasting about 4 million gallons a day (the meter company’s case study).

Limit: The case study comes from the company that sold the system. Savings depend on how leaky the pipes are to begin with. Xylem case study, Hot Springs

Let bacteria clean it first (biological filtration) A · Proven

A living layer on the sand or carbon filter eats organic matter and ammonia — with fewer chemicals. Less organic matter means fewer chlorine byproducts later. Slow sand filters work this way. Slow sand filters have run for more than 150 years; several U.S. utilities have converted filters to biological operation.

Limit: It doesn’t remove “forever chemicals” (PFAS) by itself, and slow sand filters need land. Biofiltration review, 2016 · Hazen and Sawyer

Disinfect with UV light A · Proven

Ultraviolet light kills germs without adding a chemical, so less chlorine is needed. Adding hydrogen peroxide under UV (advanced oxidation) breaks down trace chemicals too.

Limit: Some chlorine is still needed to keep water safe inside the pipes. Trojan Technologies

Let the riverbank filter it A · Proven

Wells beside a river pull water through natural sand and gravel, which filters it before it reaches the plant. Louisville Water in Kentucky uses riverbank filtration.

Limit: Only works where the ground next to the river is the right kind of sand and gravel — that takes a study. Louisville Water

Membranes (ultrafiltration) A · Proven

Very fine filters physically block germs and particles. Packaged systems are sold for small towns.

Limit: Membranes need cleaning and replacing, and they use electricity. AMTA

Remove “forever chemicals” (PFAS) A · Proven

Activated carbon, ion exchange, and reverse osmosis remove PFAS. Destroying PFAS completely (supercritical water, electrochemical methods) is still in pilots.

Limit: EPA set PFAS limits in 2024. In 2026 it proposed pushing the main deadline from 2029 to 2031 and dropping limits for four of the six chemicals — both still proposals. Test first, then decide. EPA · PFAS destruction review · EPA — proposed extension · EPA — proposed rescission

Protect the source A · Proven

Keeping the watershed healthy — forests, stream banks, fixing upstream sewage — is usually cheaper than treating dirty water. New York City protected its Catskill watershed instead of building a filtration plant estimated at up to $10 billion.

Limit: New York’s dollars don’t scale down; the idea does. PERC

Wastewater

Constructed wetlands A · Proven

Planted, shallow basins where plants, soil, and microbes clean treated wastewater further. EPA guidance calls them well suited to small towns “where inexpensive land is available.”

Limit: Needs land, and works slower in cold weather. Univ. of Arizona, summarizing EPA guidance

Algae on moving belts B · Piloted

Algae grow on belts that rotate through lagoon water, pulling out phosphorus and nitrogen. The harvested algae can become fertilizer. Gross-Wen Technologies (Iowa) — at least eight systems running in Iowa and Illinois.

Limit: Still young, and algae slow down in winter. Iowa State · phys.org, 2023

Duckweed, fungi, and “living machines” C · Lab stage

Floating plants, fungal filters, and greenhouse ecosystems that clean water. Duckweed pulled more than 93% of nitrogen and phosphorus from wastewater in a study.

Limit: Strong study results, few full-size town plants to copy. Treat as a supplement, not a whole plant. Duckweed study (MDPI) · Oberlin’s Living Machine

Recover energy and fertilizer A · Proven

Digesting sludge makes biogas; phosphorus can be recovered as a fertilizer. Tigard, Oregon became the first U.S. plant to recycle nutrients into commercial fertilizer (Ostara, 2009).

Limit: Usually pays off only at bigger plants. Ostara

New materials

Metamaterials and solar evaporation C · Lab stage

Engineered surfaces that soak up sunlight to evaporate and purify water.

Limit: Researchers say fouling, cost, and scale still need to be solved. No utility runs it. research review · J. Mater. Chem. A, 2022

Graphene membranes C · Lab stage

Ultra-thin carbon membranes that could filter faster with less energy.

Limit: Research says most use is “still limited to laboratory scale.” No U.S. water utility uses them as its main filter yet. ACS Environmental Au review

Who owns it, and how it’s paid for

Related: Commonwealth — our own money · Grow-ops. This page lays out options and their records; it doesn’t choose for anyone. Spot an error? Report it.